Mark Mizuko
CSD 8230 Neurogenic Language Disorders |
Dementia Observation - SFNH Standard/Benchmark: Standard III-C: The applicant must demonstrate knowledge of the nature of speech, language, hearing, and communication disorders and differences and swallowing disorders, including the etiologies, characteristics, anatomical/physiological, acoustic, psychological, developmental, and linguistic and cultural correlates. Specific knowledge must be demonstrated in the following areas: articulation; fluency; voice and resonance, including respiration and phonation; receptive and expressive language in speaking, listening, reading, writing, and manual modalities; hearing, including the impact on speech and language; swallowing ; cognitive aspects of communication (attention, memory, sequencing, problem-solving, executive functioning); social aspects of communication (including challenging behavior, ineffective social skills, lack of communication opportunities); communication modalities. |
||
| Performance Element | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
| Content: | Effectively answers the questions about experience and leaves a strong impression on the reader about what the student learned. | Answers the questions about experience somewhat and leaves an impression on the reader about what the student learned. | Does not answer the questions about experience.and leaves a weak impression on the reader about what the student learned. |
| Details of Assignments | Details enhance and/or clarify the writing; details are vivid and very clear. | Details enhance and/or clarify the writing; a few small modifications need to be made. | Details do not enhance or clarify the writing; there are not many details included. |
| Reflection | The reflection leaves a strong impression on the reader about what the student learned. Extensive evidence of a personal response to issues raised in the assignment. | The reflection leaves an impression on the reader about what the student learned. Evidence of a personal response to issues raised in the assignment. | The reflection leaves a weak impression on the reader about what the student learned. Little evidence of a personal response to issues raised in the assignment. |