Mark Mizuko




CSD 8230 Neurogenic Language Disorders
Graduate
11/12/07

Dementia Observation - SFNH



Standard/Benchmark:
Standard III-C: The applicant must demonstrate knowledge of the nature of speech, language, hearing, and communication disorders and differences and swallowing disorders, including the etiologies, characteristics, anatomical/physiological, acoustic, psychological, developmental, and linguistic and cultural correlates. Specific knowledge must be demonstrated in the following areas: articulation; fluency; voice and resonance, including respiration and phonation; receptive and expressive language in speaking, listening, reading, writing, and manual modalities; hearing, including the impact on speech and language; swallowing ; cognitive aspects of communication (attention, memory, sequencing, problem-solving, executive functioning); social aspects of communication (including challenging behavior, ineffective social skills, lack of communication opportunities); communication modalities.


Performance Element Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
Content: Effectively answers the questions about experience and leaves a strong impression on the reader about what the student learned. Answers the questions about experience somewhat and leaves an impression on the reader about what the student learned. Does not answer the questions about experience.and leaves a weak impression on the reader about what the student learned.
Details of Assignments Details enhance and/or clarify the writing; details are vivid and very clear. Details enhance and/or clarify the writing; a few small modifications need to be made. Details do not enhance or clarify the writing; there are not many details included.
Reflection The reflection leaves a strong impression on the reader about what the student learned. Extensive evidence of a personal response to issues raised in the assignment. The reflection leaves an impression on the reader about what the student learned. Evidence of a personal response to issues raised in the assignment. The reflection leaves a weak impression on the reader about what the student learned. Little evidence of a personal response to issues raised in the assignment.